TPRM Review AI Analyst
One vendor assessment used to take your team 60 hours.Now you can do it in under 20.
Our TPRM Review AI Analyst ingests vendor evidence, flags what is missing or insufficient, and lets reviewers engage by exception. Parallel reviews across every subsidiary. Real-time visibility. Audit-ready records on demand.
per vendor assessment, live customer data
across 53 vendors and 10 Group Companies
within 12 months of deployment
The Problem
Spreadsheets Cannot Govern Vendor Risk Across Five Countries
HQ is flying blind on subsidiary vendor risk.
Each Group Company runs its own spreadsheets, its own process. Regional HQ cannot see which vendors are compliant, which are overdue, where the next breach is hiding. By the time data reaches HQ, the spreadsheet is weeks old.
Two internal review rounds. Weeks of coordination. Per vendor.
A Fortune 500 insurer across 10 Group Companies may spend 60 hours per vendor: distributing questionnaires, chasing evidence, coordinating HQ and GCs, then doing it all again when evidence comes back thin.
Email chains do not hold up in an audit.
Vendor clarifications buried in threads. Approvals scattered across inboxes. Evidence with no version control. When the regulator asks for documentation, the team digs through folders for days. Every cycle resets the clock.
The queue grows faster than the team.
A financial institution with 2,000+ employees and 500+ vendors runs a lean security team. Each assessment can stretch over a month. New vendors onboard while old ones come up for review. The queue never clears.
How It Works
How the TPRM Review AI Analyst Works
Distribute questionnaires, collect evidence, and let our TPRM Review AI Analyst review everything before your team engages. What comes back is a pre-triaged assessment with evidence flagged as appropriate, insufficient, or missing.
Send questionnaires to multiple vendors in one action. Vendors upload evidence at the question level. Real-time progress across every vendor and Group Company. No chasing attachments across email threads.
Our TPRM Review AI Analyst reviews every submitted file against your assessment questions, flagging what is appropriate, insufficient, or missing. Your reviewer opens only the items that need attention, not all 50 evidence files.
Reviewers engage on flagged items only. Direct platform communication with vendors, no GC team as relay. Every decision timestamped, every action logged. One auditable record per vendor.
Capabilities
Enterprise TPRM Needs More Than a Questionnaire Engine
Third-party risk at scale is a coordination, visibility, and audit problem spread across countries, teams, and regulators.
HQ and Subsidiaries Review Simultaneously
Reviewers engage while vendors are still responding. Regional HQ and local GC teams work on the same platform in real time. The sequential back-and-forth is what drags assessments out for weeks.
Your Team Reviews by Exception
Our TPRM Review AI Analyst reviews all vendor evidence before anyone opens a file. Each piece gets rated appropriate, insufficient, or missing. Your team focuses on flagged items instead of opening dozens of files to find the few that matter.
Every Vendor. Every Country. One Dashboard
Track assessment progress across all vendors and Group Companies in real time. See which GCs are on track, which vendors are delayed, and where risk is accumulating, without waiting for a status update.
Regulatory Documentation in Minutes
Every interaction, submission, decision, and communication captured in one timestamped record. When the regulator walks in, retrieve everything in minutes. A fast-growing Indian financial institution did exactly this during a live RBI audit.
Deeper Reviews for Higher-Risk Vendors
Configure assessment depth by tier. A payment processor gets deeper scrutiny than an office supplier. Our TPRM Review AI Analyst adapts to the risk level you set, applying more checks where exposure is highest.
Templates Evolve. Past Responses Stay Mapped
Update templates without losing history. When you move to v1.1, our TPRM Review AI Analyst surfaces what changed and which vendors need re-assessment, preserving the audit chain.
Compare
What Breaks When TPRM Runs on Spreadsheets
Most TPRM programs start on Excel. Some move to a GRC platform. A few outsource. Here is where each approach breaks, and what our TPRM Review AI Analyst does.
One assessment spawns dozens of email threads. Evidence files named 'Final_v3_Updated.xlsx.' HQ waits weeks for a spreadsheet from each GC, then reviews sequentially. No real-time visibility. No audit trail.
222 assessments across 53 vendors and 10 Group Companies on one platform. Real-time progress dashboard. Evidence rated before human review. One auditable record per vendor.
A system of record stores vendor data but does not evaluate it. Your team still opens every file and reads every page, just inside a costlier interface. The platform tracks. It does not analyze.
Our TPRM Review AI Analyst sits on top of your existing eGRC, ingests questionnaires and evidence, performs the analysis, writes structured results back. Your platform stays the system of record. Our AI does the review.
An outside firm assesses your vendors once and delivers a report. Six months later, new systems, new risks. The report is stale. Every cycle means a new engagement at the same cost.
Our TPRM Review AI Analyst runs continuously across every new vendor, periodic review, and regulatory update. Same speed, same consistency, at a fraction of the cost of a recurring engagement.
At 100+ assessments a year, teams review a sample of evidence. 250 out of 2,500 items, assuming the pattern holds. It does not hold when the skipped file is the one the auditor finds.
100% evidence coverage with less human effort. Every file, every question, every vendor reviewed. Human reviewers engage only on flagged items. 0% false negatives across 9+ months of live deployments.
From Manual to AI
What Changed When AI Started Reviewing Vendor Evidence
Observed outcomes from production TPRM programs across financial services and insurance.
A Fortune 500 insurer across 10 Group Companies reduced assessments from 60 hours to under 20 each. Sequential review was replaced with parallel reviews and AI-pre-triaged evidence on one platform.
A fast-growing Indian financial institution ran 84 assessments in 12 months, scaling to 150+ with the same team. What stretched over a month per vendor now completes in under a week.
During a live regulatory audit, the compliance team at a fast-growing Indian financial institution retrieved and submitted all requested documentation in under two minutes. The same task previously took days.
A Fortune 500 insurer ran its TPRM program through our AI Analyst, spanning 53 vendors across 5 countries. 10x return on investment with zero additional headcount.
“Reviews can now be conducted in parallel as responses come in, significantly shortening review cycles at both the local GC and regional headquarters levels.”
– Regional IT Governance Senior Manager, Fortune 500 Insurer
Who It's For
Three Roles That Outgrew Vendor Risk Spreadsheets
For enterprise TPRM programs governing vendor risk across multiple countries and entities.
Regional CISO / IT Governance Head, Multinational Financial Group
Overseeing vendor risk across 10+ Group Companies in 5 countries, with no real-time visibility into GC-level assessments and inconsistent standards across markets.
“I cannot see what is happening at the GC level until a spreadsheet lands in my inbox. By then, the data is weeks old and the project waiting on security sign-off is already delayed.”
– Regional IT Governance Head, large insurance group
TPRM Manager, Financial Institution Under Regulatory Scrutiny
Managing 100+ vendor assessments per year with a lean team, where every assessment is audit fodder and the regulator can walk in at any time.
“During the RBI audit, we retrieved everything in two minutes. I did not think that was possible.”
– Compliance Reviewer, Indian financial institution
Local GC Security Analyst, Multinational Subsidiary
Executing vendor assessments locally while coordinating with regional HQ, stuck as the message relay between vendors and headquarters.
“Even small delays in security checklists could push back project kickoff dates. I spent more time forwarding emails than doing security work.”
– Cyber Security Analyst, Vietnam GC
Our TPRM Review AI Analyst deploys in your own cloud, on-premises, or air-gapped with your choice of LLM. Vendor data never leaves your environment. IMDA accredited. Deployed on Singapore GCC.
FAQ
Questions About Third Party Risk Management Automation With AI
Most GRC platforms store vendor data and track status, but they do not evaluate evidence. Your team still opens every file.
Our TPRM Review AI Analyst sits on top of your existing platform, reviews the evidence, and flags what needs attention. 140+ day-1 integrations including ServiceNow, Archer, and SharePoint.
Configurable assessment frameworks: TMHD, MAS TRM, RBI, APRA, ISO 27001, or your own standard. Each Group Company applies its local requirements while regional HQ sees a consolidated view.
Vendor tiers, depth, and templates are configurable per entity.
No. Our TPRM Review AI Analyst deploys in your own cloud, on-premises, or air-gapped with your choice of LLM. Vendor evidence and communications never leave your environment.
IMDA accredited. Deployed on Singapore GCC.
No. Our TPRM Review AI Analyst bolts onto your existing eGRC, ingests your questionnaires and vendor data, performs the review, and writes results back.
140+ day-1 integrations. Your eGRC remains the system of record.
Yes. A scoped proof-of-value: one assessment framework, a subset of your vendors, your actual evidence. You see our TPRM Review AI Analyst review real vendor submissions on your own data.
The pilot runs 3 to 6 months, credited toward your contract on conversion.
See what the TPRM Review AI Analyst flags in your vendor evidence.
18+ enterprise CISOs have watched our TPRM Review AI Analyst work on their vendor population. Bring your assessment framework and a handful of vendor records. See the results in under 20 hours.