Evidence Auditor AI Analyst
Your team spends 80 hours reviewing evidence for one assessment.Now you can do it in 14 minutes.
Our Evidence Auditor AI Analyst reads uploaded PDFs, Word documents, and screenshots, evaluates assessee comments, and assigns a compliance rating with written reasoning per question. 530x faster than manual review.
than human evidence review, live deployments
on compliance decisions, independently confirmed
574 pages + 307 comments, one AI run
The Problem
Manual Evidence Review Does Not Scale Past Your First Audit
Hundreds of questions. Dozens of evidence files. One reviewer.
A single vendor assessment can generate 50 evidence files, 300 questions, and 400 assessee comments. A senior reviewer may need to open every file, read every page, and cross-check every comment. One assessment can burn two weeks.
Evidence arrives in any format and language. Your team reads it all.
PDFs, Word documents, screenshots, text justifications with no file attached. Across Southeast Asia, evidence shows up in Thai, Vietnamese, Japanese. A reviewer opens each file and judges each submission. No shortcuts.
The assessment queue grows faster than your team can clear it.
A large insurer running 100+ assessments a year across 10 Group Companies can hit a wall. Each assessment dumps more evidence than the last. The queue may never clear. And when projects stall, business blames compliance.
You review a sample and hope the rest was fine. Auditors know what you skipped.
Industry data pegs manual vendor reviews at 15 to 20 hours per supplier. At 100 assessments a year, reviewing everything becomes impossible, so teams sample. The unread 90% is often where the exit-interview finding hides.
How It Works
How the Evidence Auditor AI Analyst Works
Upload evidence, define your scope, and connect your question set. The Evidence Auditor returns a compliance rating per question with written reasoning, flagged inconsistencies, and a downloadable audit artifact.
Drop in PDFs, Word docs, screenshots, and assessee comments. Point to your question set or control framework. The Evidence Auditor reads files in their original format and language. Thai documents, Japanese reports, Vietnamese submissions: all ingested as-is.
Set the testing window, sampling rules, and control frequency. Specify which standards apply: ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, MAS TRM, or your own framework. The Evidence Auditor adapts to your parameters, not a generic template.
Every file, every comment, every question evaluated in parallel. The Evidence Auditor cross-references evidence against both the question text and the assessee's own justification, then assigns a compliance rating with written reasoning.
A complete audit trail: every decision, every piece of reasoning, evidence-to-question mappings, and flagged inconsistencies. Timestamped, traceable, and ready to hand to your auditor or upload to your eGRC.
Capabilities
Built for Evidence That Does Not Arrive in a Single Format
Enterprise compliance evidence is scattered across file types, languages, and teams. These six capabilities let the Evidence Auditor make sense of it all.
Reads PDFs, Word Docs, Screenshots, and Text Justifications
Drop in whatever your assessees submitted. The Evidence Auditor routes each file to the right question. A 40-page SOC 2 report, an AWS config screenshot, a paragraph of written justification: all handled in one run.
Reads Thai and Japanese. Outputs English
Evidence arrives in whatever language your operations run in. The Evidence Auditor reads and evaluates documents in the original language, then produces English reasoning your team can act on without a translation step or a bilingual colleague.
Surfaces What Needs Attention Before Your Reviewer Opens a File
The Evidence Auditor reviews everything upfront and surfaces only what needs attention: missing evidence, insufficient samples, mismatches between comments and files, wrong testing windows. Your reviewer opens a triaged list, not a stack of unread documents.
Evaluates Written Arguments When No Evidence File Is Attached
Some assessees submit a paragraph of reasoning instead of a document. The Evidence Auditor evaluates that argument on its own merits, cross-referencing the text against the question and control description before assigning a rating.
Works Against Different Frameworks
Define the test scenario once: sampling window, control frequency, and evidence requirements. The Evidence Auditor applies those parameters across every question in your assessment, whether you are running ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, MAS TRM, or your own custom framework.
Every Rating Grounded in Your Controls
The Context Graph stores your policies, controls, and past audit decisions with provenance and confidence metadata, so the Evidence Auditor references your own environment when it rates compliance. 0% false negatives across months of live deployments.
Compare
What Fails When Evidence Review Hits Enterprise Scale
Most teams have tried to make evidence review work with the tools at hand. The Evidence Auditor is built for the moment those tools stop working.
A reviewer opens every file, reads every page, types findings into a spreadsheet. At 4 minutes per page, hundreds of pages take 80 hours. With dozens of assessments a year, the math forces sampling. Most evidence goes unread.
The Evidence Auditor evaluates every file, question, and comment in a single run at 100% coverage. Each rating comes with written reasoning in an audit-ready record an external auditor can trace.
A general-purpose model condenses a 50-page evidence pack into a paragraph. It cannot judge whether a specific file proves a specific control is working, and accuracy degrades on long documents.
The Context Graph grounds evaluations in your controls and policies. Output is a compliance rating per question with source citations. Not a summary, but a defensible audit artifact an external auditor can trace back to the evidence.
A system of record stores evidence but does not evaluate it. Your team still opens every file and reads every page. It tracks submissions but does not analyze them. It is a filing cabinet with a login screen.
The Evidence Auditor sits on top of your existing eGRC, ingests your question sets and evidence, performs the analysis, and writes structured results back. Your platform stays the system of record. Our AI Analyst handles the review.
An outside firm assesses evidence once, delivers a point-in-time report, and the engagement ends. When the next audit cycle starts, you pay the same fee all over again. The report ages the moment it is delivered, and every regulatory update means a new engagement.
The Evidence Auditor runs continuously across every assessment, audit cycle, and regulatory update. Same speed, same accuracy, at a fraction of the cost of a recurring engagement. No re-engagement invoice each cycle.
From Manual to AI
What Changed When Evidence Review Moved From Manual to AI
Observed outcomes from production deployments across financial services, insurance, and professional services.
A Fortune 500 insurer across 10 Group Companies ran 327 assessment questions, 574 pages of evidence across 43 files, and 307 assessee comments through the Evidence Auditor. Completed in 14 minutes. Manual equivalent: 20 to 141 hours.
When the Evidence Auditor flags a control as non-compliant, reviewers confirm it every time. This zero false negative rate is validated independently across TPRM, RCSA, and internal audit workflows at multiple enterprise customers.
During a live regulatory audit at a fast-growing Indian financial institution, the compliance team retrieved every piece of evidence, rating, and reviewer decision in under two minutes. The same task previously required days of digging across folders and inboxes.
A regional insurance group deployed the Evidence Auditor across its TPRM program and documented US$114,000 in direct savings in year one. 10x return within 12 months, achieved with the same team and zero additional headcount.
“Auditors are going to love it. Very good. It will make it very easy for anyone to go and check.”
– Independent ISO 27001 Auditor, 15+ years experience
Who It Is For
Three Teams That Need Evidence Review to Move Faster
For GRC, internal audit, and operational risk teams that review evidence at scale.
Head of Operational Risk Management, Large Financial Institution
Runs RCSA cycles across thousands of controls with evidence arriving from business units on staggered deadlines, across multiple formats and languages. Running two full review cycles per submission because the first pass always uncovers gaps.
“We run two rounds. BUs submit, GORM reviews, then BUs resubmit. If we could cut one of those rounds without missing anything, that alone pays for itself.”
– Head of GORM, large regional insurance group
TPRM Manager, Financial Institution Under Active Regulatory Oversight
Manages 100+ vendor assessments per year with a lean team. Each assessment produces 50+ evidence files. The regulator can request any record at any time, and the answer must arrive in minutes, not days.
“During our last regulatory audit, we pulled every piece of documentation in under two minutes. Before the Evidence Auditor, that would have been days of panic.”
– Compliance Reviewer, Indian financial institution
Internal Audit Manager Pursuing ISO 27001 Certification
Preparing for certification with a small team, manually collating evidence against 93 Annex A controls. The external auditor walkthrough is weeks away and evidence is still being assembled across departments.
“The auditor navigated from policy to control to evidence without asking us a single clarification question. I have never seen that happen before.”
– CIO, professional services firm (700+ employees)
The Evidence Auditor AI Analyst deploys in your own cloud, on-premises, or air-gapped with your choice of LLM. Your evidence never leaves your environment. IMDA accredited. Deployed on Singapore GCC.
FAQ
Questions About Automating Evidence Review With AI
Our Evidence Auditor uses RAGAS metrics and withholds output when confidence drops below threshold. Across 9 to 10 months of live deployments, it has produced 0% false negatives: when it flags a control as non-compliant, reviewers confirm it every time.
The false positive rate runs around 10% by design. A human reviewer makes the final call on edge cases.
PDFs, Word documents, and screenshots or PNG files. It also evaluates plain-text assessee justifications when no file is attached.
For multilingual operations, it reads Thai, Vietnamese, Japanese, Spanish, and other languages, then outputs English reasoning for the review team. No translation step needed before submission.
No. The Evidence Auditor deploys in your own cloud, on-premises, or air-gapped with your choice of LLM. Evidence files, control descriptions, and assessment data never leave your environment.
IMDA accredited. Deployed on Singapore GCC.
No. The Evidence Auditor sits on top of your existing eGRC. It ingests your question sets and evidence, performs the analysis, and writes structured results back.
140+ day-1 integrations. Your eGRC stays the system of record.
Yes. A scoped proof-of-value: one assessment framework, your evidence, your controls. The Evidence Auditor reviews your actual data, not a demo dataset.
The pilot runs 3 to 6 months and the cost is credited toward your annual contract on conversion.
See what the Evidence Auditor finds in your own evidence.
18+ enterprise CISOs have watched the Evidence Auditor review their actual assessment data live. Bring your evidence files, your question set, and your control descriptions. See the results in 15 minutes.